CSU East Bay logo

Chemistry 352

Atomic Spectroscopy

Electric Dipole (E1) Selection Rules in LS Coupling

The strongest atomic lines correspond to electric dipole (E1) transitions between Russell–Saunders term states \(\;{}^{2S+1}L_J \rightarrow {}^{2S'+1}L'_{J'}\;\). In LS coupling, the dipole operator acts on the spatial (orbital) part of the electronic wavefunction and does not flip electron spins, so only certain changes in quantum numbers are allowed.

Transitions that violate these rules are electric-dipole forbidden (they may still occur weakly via magnetic dipole or electric quadrupole mechanisms, but with much smaller intensity).

Worked Example: \(\;{}^3D \rightarrow {}^3P\;\)

Test whether the term-to-term transition \(\;{}^3D \rightarrow {}^3P\;\) is E1-allowed.

  1. Spin: \({}^3D\) and \({}^3P\) both have \(2S+1=3\Rightarrow S=1\), so \(\Delta S = 0\)
  2. Orbital angular momentum: \(D \Rightarrow L=2\), \(P \Rightarrow L'=1\), so \(\Delta L = -1\)
  3. Total angular momentum: For \({}^3D\), allowed \(J = 3,2,1\); for \({}^3P\), allowed \(J' = 2,1,0\). Since \(\Delta J=0,\pm1\), several fine-structure branches are allowed, e.g. \({}^3D_3\rightarrow{}^3P_2\), \({}^3D_2\rightarrow{}^3P_2,{}^3P_1\), \({}^3D_1\rightarrow{}^3P_2,{}^3P_1,{}^3P_0\)
  4. Parity: An E1 transition requires a parity change. A \(D\leftrightarrow P\) change is consistent with opposite parity (typical for \(\Delta l=\pm 1\) behavior in the underlying one-electron promotion), so the parity requirement can be satisfied ✅

Conclusion: \(\boxed{{}^3D \rightarrow {}^3P \text{ is E1-allowed in LS coupling.}}\) In observed spectra, this usually appears as a multiplet of several closely spaced lines due to spin–orbit splitting of the \(J\) levels.

Landé Interval Rule (Spin–Orbit Splittings in LS Coupling)

In Russell–Saunders (LS) coupling, a single term \(\;{}^{2S+1}L\;\) is split by spin–orbit coupling into several fine-structure levels \(\;{}^{2S+1}L_J\;\) with \(J = L+S,\,L+S-1,\,\ldots,\,|L-S|\). The Landé interval rule predicts how the energy spacing between adjacent \(J\) levels scales across the multiplet.

A convenient LS-coupling model for the spin–orbit energy shift is \[ E_J = E_0 + \frac{A}{2}\Big(J(J+1)-L(L+1)-S(S+1)\Big), \] where \(E_0\) is the term center-of-gravity energy and \(A\) (often called the spin–orbit constant) depends on the specific atom and term.

Taking the difference between adjacent \(J\) values gives the Landé interval rule: \[ E_{J+1}-E_{J} = A\,(J+1). \] So the separations between consecutive fine-structure levels are in the ratio \(\;1:2:3:\cdots\;\) as \(J\) increases (within a given term).

The Landé interval rule is most accurate when LS coupling is a good approximation; significant deviations can indicate intermediate coupling or strong configuration interaction.

Interactive: Fine-Structure Splittings & Allowed E1 Lines (Landé Interval Rule)

Enter spin–orbit constants \(A'\) (upper term) and \(A''\) (lower term), then click Update to compute: (1) the fine-structure energy level diagram and (2) the allowed E1 transition wavenumbers and a stick spectrum.






Model used: \(E_J = E_{\mathrm{cg}} + \frac{A}{2}\big(J(J+1)-L(L+1)-S(S+1)\big)\). The spectrum uses E1 selection rules: \(\Delta S=0\), \(\Delta L=0,\pm1\) (no \(0\leftrightarrow0\)), \(\Delta J=0,\pm1\) (no \(0\leftrightarrow0\)).

(1) Energy level diagram

(2) Allowed transitions & stick spectrum

Tip: try changing the sign of \(A\) to see how the ordering of \(J\) levels flips.

Practice: Selection Rules & Landé Interval Rule

Problem 1
Which set of conditions must be satisfied for an electric dipole (E1) transition between term states in LS coupling?
A. \(\Delta S=\pm1\), \(\Delta L=0,\pm2\), no parity restriction
B. \(\Delta S=0\), \(\Delta L=0,\pm1\) (no \(0\leftrightarrow0\)), \(\Delta J=0,\pm1\) (no \(0\leftrightarrow0\)), parity must change
C. \(\Delta S=0\), \(\Delta L=0\) only, parity unchanged
D. \(\Delta S\) unrestricted, \(\Delta J=0,\pm2\)
Problem 2
Which fine-structure component is E1-allowed for the transition \({}^3D \rightarrow {}^3P\)?
A. \({}^3D_3 \rightarrow {}^3P_0\)
B. \({}^3D_2 \rightarrow {}^3P_0\)
C. \({}^3D_1 \rightarrow {}^3P_0\)
D. \({}^3D_3 \rightarrow {}^3P_1\)
Problem 3
A \({}^3P\) term splits into \({}^3P_2, {}^3P_1, {}^3P_0\). What ratio of adjacent splittings is predicted by the Landé interval rule?
A. \(\Delta E_{2-1} : \Delta E_{1-0} = 2 : 1\)
B. \(\Delta E_{2-1} : \Delta E_{1-0} = 1 : 2\)
C. \(1 : 1\)
D. Cannot be predicted
Problem 4
For a given LS term, what does the sign of the spin–orbit constant \(A\) determine?
A. Whether ΔS = 0
B. Whether ΔL = 0 or ±1
C. Whether parity changes
D. The ordering of the J levels in energy
Problem 5
A \({}^3P\) term has \(A = +30\ \text{cm}^{-1}\). What spacing does the Landé interval rule predict between \({}^3P_2\) and \({}^3P_1\)?
A. \(30\ \text{cm}^{-1}\)
B. \(60\ \text{cm}^{-1}\)
C. \(90\ \text{cm}^{-1}\)
D. \(120\ \text{cm}^{-1}\)

Key points (one glance)

Big picture: In LS coupling, selection rules tell you which transitions can be strong (E1-allowed), and the Landé interval rule tells you how spin–orbit coupling spaces the \({}^{2S+1}L_J\) levels. Put together, they predict the pattern of multiplet lines and how those lines shift when the spin–orbit constants change.